fbpx

Fossil Fuels vs Clean Energy: The Year Ahead

Your capital is at risk if you invest. You could lose all your investment. Please see the full risk warning here.

Russia’s actions in Ukraine – and the resultant sanctions – have obviously thrown energy markets in a tizzy. With the US President signing into an effect a ban on import of Russian energy products yesterday, traders are betting that oil prices could cross $200 a barrel by the end of March. There is also a significant call for diversifying energy away from fossil fuels, given how current energy supply is dominated by nations such as Saudi Arabia, Russia and Venezuela which are frequently in the maelstrom of strife. On top of all this is a long-overdue “ratio cool-off” that has been instrumental in the recent downturn of the US equity market (home to some of the most overvalued stocks in the world) as well as US inflation hitting 40-year highs.

Given these facts, analysing both ends of the energy spectrum would be in order. To do this, two ETFs are examined: the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE) with over $38 billion in Assets Under Management (AUM) to represent “fossil fuels” and the iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) with around $5 billion in AUM to represent “clean energy”.

The Overvaluation Problem

The ETF’s holdings and their ratios – Price to Earnings (PE), Price to Sales (PS) and Price to Book (PB) – are analysed in 1-year windows starting from May 2019 onwards till 2021. Subsequently, they’re further analysed at the dawn of 2022 (as the ratio cool-off gathered steam) and in the beginning of March (after Russia’s actions in Ukraine and subsequent energy outlook changed).

The ratios are calculated in two formats:

  1. The average; wherein the significant ratios of each of the ETF’s constituents are averaged outright;

  2. The weighted-average; wherein said ratios have each constituent’s weight factored to determine an effective proxy for indicating the ETF’s ratio as a whole.

Note: Most data providers put upper and lower bounds on ratios and fiscals. For example, if earnings are too low or PE is too high, they generally don’t report it as these aren’t considered to hold actionable information. Only reported numbers are considered in these calculations.

Across each window, XLE shows strong consistency in top holdings: 4 out of 6 companies – Chevron, ConocoPhillips, EOG Resources, Schlumberger, Exxon and Phillips 66 – account for a little over 50% by weight in the ETF. On the other hand, ICLN has anywhere from 9 to 11 companies amounting to 50%, with Enphase, Vestas, Plug Power and SolarEdge frequently (but not always) appearing in the Top 5.

In the ratio analysis, there are quite a few items of interest. With respect to PE Ratios, valuations of Clean Energy stocks had been sky high relative to fossil fuel stocks even in 2019. While both sets of stocks were extensively overvalued in 2021, the comparison between weighed and weighted-average indicates some stocks were massively overvalued. This is apparent even in March this year, despite ratios slipping below those observed in H1 2019. In comparison, fossil fuel stocks’ average and weighted-average tend to be close together – suggesting relatively more coordinated valuation.

With respect to both PS and PB Ratios, fossil fuel stocks’ weighted-average tends to be nearly twice the average across the windows, which suggests that the top stocks’ prices are relatively overvalued over the rest in terms of sales and book value. When it comes to clean energy, the converse is true, suggesting that the overvaluation problem is more widespread, with the valuation of smaller stocks (by weight) being more speculative.

There was a reckoning of sorts near H1 2021 where the weighted-average PS Ratios of clean energy stocks fell below that of the average – which suggests that corrective actions had taken place before a bounce back at the end of 2021. However, this has returned in March. Absent overvaluations in PE Ratios, PS Ratios tend to be a strong indicator of stock performance in the recent downturn. Thus, there is a strong chance of overvaluation corrections continuing to drag down the stock price of clean energy stocks.

The Overvaluation Problem

Now, most companies in the clean energy space tend to feed the electricity grid. Electricity rates tend to vary by region but the closest proxy to average consumption in the U.S. would be the “Consumer Price Index: US City Electricity Average” which is tabulated with a slight lag. With the data on hand till the end of 2021, it is observed that ICLN’s performance has a widely-varying correlation with the increasing costs of electricity in the US.

On the other hand, fossil fuel stocks – particularly of companies involved with petroleum – have traditionally strong correlations with company earnings over the years (minus, of course, the cost of exploration and infrastructure). Earnings, in turn, are strongly correlated with crude oil prices. The correlation between Brent and XLE price performance has been strengthening over the recent years with 2022 in the year till date being particularly high.

After a hyperbolic 2020, XLE’s AUM changes have shown an increasingly strong trend with prices since H1 2021 with March starting off on a downward trajectory.

On the other hand, when it comes to XLE, there is very strong lockstep behaviour, with March starting off on an upward trajectory after a panicky drop around the time of Russian actions in Ukraine.

In Conclusion

Given the relative maturity and high operational efficiency of fossil fuel companies as well as crude oil’s bullish outlook, oil-related instruments can only be assumed to go up over the month; these companies are the epitome of value stocks that will likely continue to deliver benefits over the year.

Since clean energy isn’t ubiquitous yet and hasn’t achieved comparable efficiency, these companies are very much in their growth phase. The “ratio cool-off” has been hitting companies with rosy growth narratives particularly hard. However, given the push for energy diversification by recent events, there will likely be several opportunities in either direction for tactical investors. Seasoned strategic investors, on the other hand, will likely be wary as the “floor price” for growth stocks remains uncertain.

Your capital is at risk if you invest. You could lose all your investment. Please see the full risk warning here.

Related Posts

Gold is in a healthy correction and higher price levels are likely by year end.
Gold is in a healthy correction and higher price levels are likely by year end.
Violeta-540x540-1.jpg
Violeta Todorova
Gold is in a healthy correction and higher price levels are likely by year end.
Gold is in a healthy correction and higher price levels are likely by year end.
Gold is in a healthy correction and higher price levels are likely by year end.
Supply, demand disequilibrium and lower US rates could squeeze the non-precious metal
Supply, demand disequilibrium and lower US rates could squeeze the non-precious metal
Violeta-540x540-1.jpg
Boyan Girginov
Supply, demand disequilibrium and lower US rates could squeeze the non-precious metal
Supply, demand disequilibrium and lower US rates could squeeze the non-precious metal
Supply, demand disequilibrium and lower US rates could squeeze the non-precious metal
Q2 is poised for European stocks’ turnaround and rising interest in energy stocks
Q2 is poised for European stocks’ turnaround and rising interest in energy stocks
Violeta-540x540-1.jpg
Sandeep Rao
Q2 is poised for European stocks’ turnaround and rising interest in energy stocks
Q2 is poised for European stocks’ turnaround and rising interest in energy stocks
Q2 is poised for European stocks’ turnaround and rising interest in energy stocks
Escalation of the conflict in the Middle East threatens to derail the economic recovery.
Escalation of the conflict in the Middle East threatens to derail the economic recovery.
Violeta-540x540-1.jpg
Violeta Todorova
Escalation of the conflict in the Middle East threatens to derail the economic recovery.
Escalation of the conflict in the Middle East threatens to derail the economic recovery.
Escalation of the conflict in the Middle East threatens to derail the economic recovery.
What is an ETF? How does an ETF work? Key characteristics of ETFs.
What is an ETF? How does an ETF work? Key characteristics of ETFs.
Violeta-540x540-1.jpg
Boyan Girginov
What is an ETF? How does an ETF work? Key characteristics of ETFs.
What is an ETF? How does an ETF work? Key characteristics of ETFs.
What is an ETF? How does an ETF work? Key characteristics of ETFs.
Violeta-540x540-1.jpg
Pawel Uchman
A quick primer on leveraged instruments available in markets today.
A quick primer on leveraged instruments available in markets today.
Violeta-540x540-1.jpg
Sandeep Rao
A quick primer on leveraged instruments available in markets today.
A quick primer on leveraged instruments available in markets today.
A quick primer on leveraged instruments available in markets today.

Violeta Todorova

Senior Research

Violeta è entrata a far parte di Leverage Shares nel settembre 2022. È responsabile dello svolgimento di analisi tecniche e ricerche macroeconomiche ed azionarie, fornendo pregiate informazioni per aiutare a definire le strategie di investimento per i clienti.

Prima di cominciare con LS, Violeta ha lavorato presso diverse società di investimento di alto profilo in Australia, come Tollhurst e Morgans Financial, dove ha trascorso gli ultimi 12 anni della sua carriera.

Violeta è un tecnico di mercato certificato dall’Australian Technical Analysts Association e ha conseguito un diploma post-laurea in finanza applicata e investimenti presso Kaplan Professional (FINSIA), Australia, dove è stata docente per diversi anni.

Julian Manoilov

Marketing Lead

Julian è entrato a far parte di Leverage Shares nel 2018 come parte della prima espansione della società in Europa orientale. È responsabile della progettazione di strategie di marketing e della promozione della notorietà del marchio.

Oktay Kavrak

Head of Communications and Strategy

Oktay è entrato a far parte di Leverage Shares alla fine del 2019. È responsabile della crescita aziendale, mantenendo relazioni chiave e sviluppando attività di vendita nei mercati di lingua inglese.

È entrato in LS da UniCredit, dove è stato responsabile delle relazioni aziendali per le multinazionali. La sua precedente esperienza è in finanza aziendale e amministrazione di fondi in società come IBM Bulgaria e DeGiro / FundShare.

Oktay ha conseguito una laurea in Finanza e contabilità ed un certificato post-laurea in Imprenditoria presso il Babson College. Ha ottenuto anche la certificazione CFA.

Sandeep Rao

Research
Sandeep è entrato a far parte di Leverage Shares nel settembre 2020. È responsabile della ricerca sulle linee di prodotto esistenti e nuove, su asset class e strategie, con particolare riguardo all’analisi degli eventi attuali ed i loro sviluppi. Sandeep ha una lunga esperienza nei mercati finanziari. Iniziata in un hedge fund di Chicago come ingegnere finanziario, la sua carriera è proseguita in numerose società ed organizzazioni, nel corso di 8 anni – da Barclays (Capital’s Prime Services Division) al più recente Index Research Team di Nasdaq. Sandeep detiene un M.S. in Finanza ed un MBA all’Illinois Institute of Technology di Chicago.

Gold Retreats But Rally is Not Over

Copper Ready to Explode